technical due diligence consulting
Technical Due Diligence Core
Investor-grade diligence covering codebase health, delivery mechanics, and operational posture.
Narrative
We combine selective code archaeology with pipeline review and security hygiene checks proportionate to stage. Outputs emphasize reproducibility — another reviewer should reach similar conclusions from our evidence bundle.
Scope notes
- Sampling strategy documented per repository
- CI/CD posture matrix with flake indicators
- Security hygiene checklist mapped to OWASP-style themes
- Team topology versus cognitive load notes
- Third-party dependency risk snapshot
- Customer data handling narrative
- Executive summary with dissenting footnotes when evidence splits
Outcomes
- Defensible diligence artifact for internal committees
- Clear separation between cosmetic debt and release risk
- Guidance on follow-on specialist reviews if needed
Logistics
Duration: 6 weeks
Format: Remote review + targeted onsite sampling
Informational allocation: ₩9,500,000
Filters: Due diligence window · Org-wide snapshot · Full product + platform · 6 weeks
Accountable partner
Juno Kim
Principal consultant with acquisition-side review experience.
Client notes
Dissenting footnotes on Technical Due Diligence Core gave our board a realistic range instead of theatre.
Third-party dependency snapshot caught a silent fork — worth the cycle.
FAQ lane
We surface risks and mitigations; investment decisions remain with your committee.